Avoiding Employment Threats

Posted by & filed under Business Owners, Doctors, Healthcare, Resource.

Employment Lawsuits

Avoiding Employment Threats
After over a decade of educating Doctors on the importance of asset protection, we are seeing a noticeable increase in awareness. Unfortunately, the majority of Doctors who fail to employ asset protection planning give the same excuse: “Doctors never lose malpractice lawsuits with awards above coverage limits.” This is wrong for two reasons. First, half of jury awards against physicians are over $1,000,000. Second, malpractice suits are only a small percentage of the awards against Doctors. A less visible but arguably larger concern is that an employee will file a suit against the Doctor. In the larger version of this article, we will discuss the challenges of employment liability, which may result in very expensive defense costs—even in the event of fraudulent cases that you win. We will give some examples of cases that may be of interest, explain increased risks in the information age and offer some solutions.

The Risk Of Employment Lawsuitspost 13
Over the past 20 years, there have been monumental changes in the employment arena. There are a host of Federal Laws that have been put in place to protect employees’ rights and open the possibility for lawsuits against employers. Many argue that these laws are appropriate to protect the rights of workers while employers often argue that these laws place undue restrictions on their ability to manage their firms.
Regardless of which side of the issue you sit, the reality is that there are numerous “Laws of the Land” which employers must follow. Inclusive of these are the FLSA [Fair Labor Standards Act]; the ADA [Americans with Disabilities Act]; FMLA [Family Medical Leave Act]; Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; The Civil Rights Act of 1991; and many more. In addition to the federal law, California’s laws add another layer to these regulations. So what does it all mean? It means that you have to learn how to protect yourself against one of the fastest growing areas of liability.
What many employers—including Doctors—face today is the challenge of working in an ever increasingly complex world of employment regulations and guidelines. Most small business owners may have few resources with which to address human resources concerns and little or no training. This can result in the owner being held financially responsible for any mistakes they may make. It means that age-old established practices may plot a course for a company to end up in ruin. It means that business owners—including Doctors—must pay greater attention to how they hire employees; how they supervise them; and how they terminate them.
This environment has fueled the growth of Human Resources (“HR”) outsourcing. Many firms have established themselves as specialized providers of these functions for businesses, with the intent of alleviating the business owner’s HR headaches. While these firms do provide reliable HR services, they typically do not provide liability coverage for the companies they serve, especially in the realm of employee suits claiming sexual harassment, unlawful termination or discrimination. So, while business owners may benefit from outsourcing some HR tasks, they cannot outsource the risk and their companies are still responsible for their own actions. Insurance policies that address these risks are available to protect against catastrophic liability—one example is EPLI [Employment Practices Liability Insurance], also known as HIRE insurance (see www.hireins.com for more information). If the risk is real, and protective insurance is available, why are the vast majority of small business owners, including Doctors, operating without such coverage?
To small business owners, this type of coverage has historically been out of reach due to cost restrictions. Thankfully, this is now beginning the change. More affordable coverage solutions are making their way into the market. In fact, low deductible policies with coverage amounts as high as one million dollars can now be found. These more accessible policies, coupled with employment risk management services, provide a shield that can protect small business owners—including Doctors—from these potentially devastating claims.

Protecting Your Practice
There are two ways to protect your practice assets from risks. First, you can insure against the risk, effectively sharing the risk and passing it along to someone else. Second, you can assume the risk yourself and use asset protection and risk management strategies to protect assets from the threats. The second strategy is covered in Lesson 6. Here we will focus on passing off all of that risk to other people through insurance.
Fewer than 5% of small businesses (and, we imagine, even fewer medical practices) have any insurance coverage providing protection from employment-related lawsuit risks. This is despite government statistics clearly indicating that this threat is a growing problem. Additionally, recent federal court rulings have begun finding owners and management “personally liable.” This means that just incorporating a business will NOT, by itself, protect a business owner from being found personally and financially liable in employment-related suits. Thus, insurance coverage is key to protecting a business owner’s interests.
A solid EPLI policy coupled with a comprehensive risk management course can be obtained today for under $2,500 (sample for businesses of 10 employees or less). Retaining these services provides small business owners with the tools necessary to enforce the protections of the insurance coverage. By coordinating an insurance policy and consulting services, the small business owner/Doctor can expect to see a significant reduction in the threat posed by an employment lawsuit. Contact the authors at 877-656-4362 for more information.

Risks In The Information Age
Information is the currency of modern America. The role of the Internet—and its ability to locate and distribute information—has exploded in recent years. It has become the source of much of our information—our de facto provider of answers, so much so that the first thing a person will do when faced with a potentially life-changing issue is often to “Google it.”
What else, then, would you expect of an employee that feels they were treated unfairly? Most likely, they will explore the information available online and learn that they may have options available to them. In More

The Importance of Asset Protection

Posted by & filed under Business, Education, Healthcare, Legal.

Until the last part of the 20th century, it might have seemed excessive to be concerned with protecting assets from potential lawsuits. Lawsuits were not particularly common and jury awards were reasonable. In the 1980s, the number of lawsuits in the United States skyrocketed and outrageous jury awards became commonplace. This has been especially the case in employment and medical malpractice claims—two areas where Doctors are specifically targets. As such, Doc-tors have realized that protecting their assets from lawsuits needs to be the focus of any financial plan.

The Lawsuit Explosionpost 4
Why are there so many more lawsuits today? It may be because many Americans see a lawsuit as a way to “get rich quick” rather than as a way to make someone whole and ultimately achieve justice for being wronged by another. In our society, many people believe that misfortune is an opportunity to place blame and seek financial reparations—even if that person wasn’t at fault for the misfortune. Unfortunately, juries routinely adopt the idea that someone must pay for alleged wrong-doings and often disregard the facts of the case when reaching a verdict. Through emotion and bias, juries sometimes give away large sums of money to unfortunate victims, even when the defendants were not to blame for the misfortune.
To illustrate this point, let’s consider the decisions reached in some cases you may have read about in your daily newspaper:
Claim: A woman sues a franchise eatery because the coffee she spilled in her lap was too hot.
Decision: Woman receives $2.6 million.
Claim: A trespasser is injured while burglarizing a home.
Decision: Burglar receives thousands of dollars.

Claim: A Pennsylvania woman sues a physician claiming to have lost her psychic
powers during a routine set of tests.
Decision: Woman receives a jury award for $690,000.
After reading the large settlements these ordinary people receive, it seems rational that other people would begin to ask themselves, “Why not me?” The more press these cases receive, the greater the reinforcement of this belief. The greater the number of people who try to “work the system,” the greater the number of people who will eventually succeed. Each new outrageous success gains more press, and the vicious cycle of lawsuits continues.
Knowledgeable Doctors realize that this lawsuit trend cannot be ignored. They insist on having their advisors devise financial plans that address the protection of their assets. They realize that they have something to lose if they are sued, and that the plaintiff often has nothing to lose. This is especially true in the United States legal system.

American Rule Of Legal Fees
Did you know that in virtually every other legal system in the world, a plaintiff who sues un-successfully has to pay the defendant’s legal bills? That is correct. This rule, called the “British Rule,” effectively keeps people from suing others unless they truly think they have a case with merit. If a plaintiff does not have a very good case, he risks not only paying his own attorney’s fees, but also the defendant’s.
This is obviously not the situation in the United States. In U.S. courts we follow the “American Rule,” which dictates that each side pays their legal fees regardless of the outcome of the case. This rule was originally created so that people wouldn’t be discouraged from suing big businesses. Though this rule may have had some positive impact, it has created two negative consequences:
1. As a plaintiff, you have a lot less to lose if you bring a meritless case. In fact, with the prevalence of contingency fee attorneys, plaintiffs are literally in a no-lose situation as they have no “skin in the game.” This is because contingency fee attorneys do not charge their clients hourly fees. Their only compensation is a percentage of the judgment awards of the cases they win.
2. As a defendant, a winning outcome is still a losing proposition. We say this be-cause a successful defense of a lawsuit still results in significant out-of-pocket defense costs and legal fees. In addition, a legal defense results in time out of work and an unquantifiable amount of stress.
Evidently, the American Rule of legal fees encourages civil lawsuits. Proponents of the system still claim that it allows the poor access to the legal system and is a method for Americans to redress injustices. They may be right. Nonetheless, an unwanted side effect of this rule is that it also allows thousands, if not millions, of frivolous and dubious lawsuits to be filed each year.

People Abuse The Legal System
Whether it is caused by the American Rule of legal fees or not, it is clear that many people simply abuse the legal system for personal gain. This trend is so severe in California that the legislature passed the Vexatious Litigant Act, a law establishing a list of people who routinely abuse the legal system by filing too many frivolous lawsuits. These same individuals cannot be denied their constitutional right to sue. However, this act restricts them from filing suits without attorneys unless they receive a judge’s permission. This list is available to every lawyer in the state.
Who is on this list? The people on this list are those who, in the court’s opinion, have repeatedly filed lawsuits lacking merit or have engaged in other frivolous and abusive tactics.

The Diagnosis
At this point, we hope you realize what the wealthy have known for years. The American Rule of law has afforded people an opportunity to protect themselves through the courts. Unfortunately, many people have taken advantage of the system and a lawsuit frenzy has resulted in our country. In this litigious society, asset protection planning is an integral part of any comprehensive financial plan. For Doctors with greater liability than the average person, asset protection planning couldn’t be more important. Luckily, it can be integrated into a financial plan to protect assets from lawsuits, allow the Doctors to spend more time making money, and provide peace of mind. In the More